There's always some risk that people will enter bad data. There's also an argument that they'll have more incentive to do a good job if it's an area they know and care about.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Steve Coast <[email protected]> wrote: > A few people have requested that. > > The problem is collusion, what I don't want is people to enter bad data. > Showing you random points is one guard. I think selecting the county isn't > far from just ordering the batches by county. So I think that places you > third on the list. > > Get clicking! > > Steve > > > > On 6/8/2011 11:07 AM, Peter Batty wrote: > > I'd like it if I could enter any county I wanted and start working on that > :). > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Steve Coast <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Cool you're third in line. >> >> I made a couple of fixes today. Main thing is that the % completeness >> figure is now correct. >> >> Steve >> >> >> On 6/7/2011 3:50 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2011 2:10 PM, "Steve Coast" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > http://readwriteworld.cloudapp.net/?p=243 >> > >> > Right now it's going through King County, WA. Anyone have a preference >> for what order to go through the US? >> >> I'd love to see Polk County, Iowa... >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
