On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 01/13/2012 06:39 PM, Peter Dobratz wrote: >> >> I agree that it makes more sense to clean up the map after the deletes >> from the license change have taken affect. As far as I know, it's still >> being sorted out exactly which portions of the map will be deleted. > > > Personally, in the area I care for/about, my aim is for the OSMI license > change display to look like that of Dublin, or thereabouts, *before* April > 1st. For mappers in Dublin, the license change is done - they can relax and > map without bother. I envy them ;) > > I will even pre-emptively delete stuff that I know would otherwise get > deleted automatically, because that way I am in control, I see what happens, > I see the side effects, and can repair where necessary. The other option is > waiting for some bot to do something and then try and find out what happened > afterwards.
I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a decliner that I have personally been in touch with about the license change and my best judgement is that his / her decision is final. > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
