On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:18 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > On 13 January 2012 22:50, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > > >> I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner > >> changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a > >> decliner that I have personally been in touch with about the license > >> change and my best judgement is that his / her decision is final. > > > > Speaking of, has anyone talked to balrog-kun yet? I know he was at > > one point insanely prolific and I often stumble across his data, he's > > currently a decliner. > > I'm balrog-kun, if you see my data in the US you can add odbl=clean* > because I haven't used any non-ODbL sources outside of Europe. But I > have used such sources in Europe and so (Richard Weait says..) this is > not compatible with CT 1.2.4. This is not the main reason I have > declined CT, but in any case all of my own work is ODbL compatible and > me saying that probably has more legal value than a half-automatic > click-through.. well, unless I'm not balrog-kun, but then I couldn't > have put it on the user page. > > I'm not in Oregon these days which is why no new data is appearing from me. > > Cheers > > * provided other authors in the history also license their > contributions ODbL, which old LWG minutes say is *not* implied by CT > acceptance. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
So every TIGER way in the western US will require the odbl=clean tag? _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
