At 2012-02-06 16:19, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:14 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Nick Hocking <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > [..]and copy in the TIGER 2011 name from the TMS overlay (remembering to un-abreviate as you go).
>
> As a reminder: the JOSM URL for that is
> http://{switch:a,b,c}.tile.openstreetmap.us/tiger2011_roads/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png
>
> > Some roads are (unfortunately) glued to landuse polygons. For these
> > you need to unglue first to make room for the road replacement. These
> > take a lot more time but, hopefully, there are not too many of these.
>
> That's really bad practice IMO, but I find it practised here in Salt
> Lake too. Quick way to unglue: Select the way, shift-select the glued
> point(s), press g.

Ideally, these should be shifted to the border of the land use, rather
than another location within the right of way.

Exactly. As a technical matter, in almost all cases of a public roads in the US, if you look at the tract map, you will see a permanent dedication of an easement/right-of-way for the road, and that land cannot be built on. For the most part, these ROWs are even wider than the road itself has been built on. The residential and commercial landuse ways should definitely extend no further than the sidewalk in this vast majority of the scenarios.

Even if it were possible for someone to build in the middle of a street, unless they actually have done so, it shouldn't be mapped that way, since we aim to map what we see now, not duplicate a zoning map of what could be.

--
Alan Mintz <[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to