On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> The TIGER tags are not exactly standard OSM tags that belong in the >> database. Better that we get rid of them at the same time as we expand >> abbreviations. > > > Although the tiger:* keys aren't standard, the information they store is > very useful. There are plenty of people that might want to know the > different parts of a road name, so we should simply rename these tags > instead of completely blowing the data away. > > I agree with this completely. The name tag should have the full street name but having the name base and street type in there as well is great. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
