This would be an acceptable compromise. On Jun 14, 2013 6:00 PM, "Mike N" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 5:43 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> We do map proposed routes, we don't map for the renderer. >> > > earlier > > In which I would really prefer this be addressed as a rendering issue. I >> believe that's the reasonable compromise, to highlight a margin-of-error >> area defined by another tag (perhaps "corridor_width=*" or something >> similar). >> > > Since one point of view classified the solution under a rendering problem > (showing corridor_width), the chances of the OpenCycleMap maintainer > updating his style for a specific limited use case in the US are near zero. > > I think a great solution would be to do this in Openlayers / Leaflet and > implement the corridor_width attribute when defining and showing the > proposed routes. That could be hosted on any simple web host as KML; no > database or PostGreSQL needs to be set up. And this could be implemented > quite rapidly. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
