Not necessarily. The case I tend to run into, these are extremely rural roads suitable only as a last resort (or for recreational rat runs across The Big Empty) and tend to be prone to irregular maintenance, unevenly graded, do not have snow removal, may have fords, variable in width and tend to be prone to flooding. That said, while many may be passable for quite a distance in a low sedan at the speed limit (usually 45), this is by no means a reliable assumption even under ideal conditions. On Jul 3, 2014 10:37 AM, "Brad Neuhauser" <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just trying to process this: wouldn't a tracktype 1 be tagged as > unclassified or residential anyway? Or to ask a different way, assuming > that roads with houses should be tagged as residential, when should one tag > a sub-tertiary road as track vs. using unclassified? > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: >> >>> For tracks, tracktype indicates condition, and tracktype1 should be >>> drivable by any family sedan as it may even be paved. >> >> >> This. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
