On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The razed sections of the abandoned railway need not confuse anybody. > > > Will you allow razed buildings and razed streets as well in OSM ( just > curious) ? > What about previous swamps, forest, etc. that are now turned into ... ? > > Or are you requesting a exception for railways ? > I thought that was perfectly clear: railways are an exception. Or maybe you're just trolling. There's very little else that's like an abandoned railway. Though if a airelway or pipeline were dug up in parts, I'd have the same conclusion: keep the man made linear feature intact until it's completely gone. ----- Editors can be MUCH smarter about hiding clutter. I see nothing at all wrong with hiding by default razed railroads, boundary relations, and even land use polygons. Anyone who needs/wants to edit those features could turn them on.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
