Marc Gemis writes: > Sorry, but I'm not trolling. I just want to understand why the railway > people should get a different treatment.
Because there is a rendering of the data (openrailwaymap.org and the ITO specialist renderings), and because people CARE. > If you're argument is to better understand why the landscape is like it is > now, then that is also true for razed streets [1] where the road used to > come closer to the buildings in the north of it, > or razed buildings [2] where the open area in the forest used to be a > holiday center. That sounds like an excellent idea! And those streets can be rendered on openrazedstreetmap.org and on openbuildings.org. Trouble is that there isn't really anybody who cares about that. But feel free to add razed streets (I do), and razed buildings. There's a few railway=rail sidings which would make more sense if you could see the buildings they used to serve. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
