Nate Wessel <bike756@...> writes: > > > I delete plenty of TIGER driveways myself (mostly in the midwest, > *highfive*!), but I wouldn't say that the accurate ones should be > removed. If they can be identified as private driveways, they could > more easily just not be rendered on a map with no loss of accurate > data for people who might find that sort of thing useful. My general > approach has been to leave the truly accurate ones untouched, but to > delete anything who's deletion leaves the map more accurate. I just > don't feel inclined to redraw them. > I should specify, this is my (personal) policy only for untouched > TIGER imports.
*Highfive!* I'd only add that, while I've never found it a priority to map most driveways, I do try to map every shared driveway I encounter. (I look for at least two houses attached to the same driveway.) Shared driveways are the rural/suburban functional equivalent to urban alleys, and some subdivisions are chock full of them. I'd want routers to be able to direct their users a bit beyond the mailbox in those cases. To me, shared driveways are less tedious to map and more important for routing than aisles in parking lots. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
