On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Toby Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > I run into this as well. If I don't see anything close to the way on > imagery I definitely have very little problem deleting them. > > I also question the access=private tagging although not because of the > rendering. I mean technically it is correct I suppose but if you are > trying to route to an address at the end of a long driveway, the > router should tell you to go down the driveway. Tagging it as
If this really is true, then perhaps you should file a bug report. If I accurately map a residential gated community with access=private, show the gates, then wouldn't that be more valuable to set what expectations are required to get into the area. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16842943#map=18/33.78757/-111.98892 > access=private would probably prevent that from happening in most > routers. I would say access=destination might be more accurate however > really I think data consumers should know what highway=service and Who are these data consumers that you speak of? If they are freeloaders, I could careless about them. One of shifts that I have noticed over the years is that we appear to no longer care about what mappers do or how we improve the ecosystem for mappers but I hear all about data consumers. The data consumers need to adapt to OSM and not the other way around. > service=driveway together mean and appropriately handle it without an > explicit access tag. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
