On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:58 AM, maning sambale <[email protected]> wrote:
> We blogged about it here: > https://www.mapbox.com/blog/mapping-sidewalks/ > > Mapbox data team also started editing a few areas today and we found a > couple of tagging issues like turn_restrictions for footways, detected > sidewalks with bicycle=yes (is this common in the US?) > There are plenty of highway=footways in the use that allow both bikes and foot traffic. A prominent one in Seattle is the Burke-Gillman Trail. Although I've been yelled at once by a rider that felt it should only be for bikes, it is a multi use footpath. I hope your team isn't changing trails like the Burke-Gillman to include a footway=sidewalk tag. While these do a times run along roads, they are not really sidewalks. Can we get some assurances that named footpaths will be left to someone with local knowledge to review? Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
