The two-relations approach would also handle any points where the roadway
and stream diverge. For example, if the stream goes over falls, even falls
only a meter high, vehicles will have to diverge onto the bank to go around
the drop-off, not over it.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On October 28, 2015 6:33:23 PM Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote:
Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> writes:
My inclination is to use one way but that gives an issue with the
name=* tag. In the case of the Cherry Wash Trail there is two names
(“Cherry Wash” and “Cherry Wash Trail”).
My thought is to use one way with the following tags:
highway=path
name=Cherry Wash Trail
alt_name=Cherry Wash
waterway=stream
intermittent=yes
Without thinking too much:
one way for the feature
a relation with one member for the trail
a relation with one member for the stream
That seems cleaner and gets the names right.
----------
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
