On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2016-02-22 12:38 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > >> As has been mentioned before, the LWG and OSMF were and are involved in >> this process. >> > > The OSMF is not formally involved in the process, through the LWG or > otherwise. > As mentioned earlier, LWG and OSMF chose not to participate directly with the law clinic and the students. Members of the LWG (Alyssa) and OSMF (Mikel, Martijn) are involved in the process that OpenStreetMap US is kicking off. LWG and OSMF have repeatedly been invited to participate. If other members are not interested in this process, that's OK. > OpenStreetMap US is free to engage with law students to ask legal > questions about OpenStreetMap, like any other organization. Of course, they > need to be careful with the OpenStreetMap mark to make sure they're not > implying the results or process is anything official. We never claimed that results would be legally binding or "official". As has been mentioned several times, the goal of this is to get the students acquainted with our project, the strong, supportive community, and hopefully get them to continue working with the community in the future.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
