I agree that seems wrong.. If you’ve got a list of changesets, or the username who is doing it, I can help with the revert. Thanks, Bryan
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Albert Pundt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Recently somebody went around and bulk-"demoted" many northern NJ roads. > Granted, some of these were marked as trunk and primary that would probably > be better as primary and secondary, respectively, but this person made > various trunk routes secondary (including major arterials such as US 206, NJ > 15, US 46, NJ 31, etc. that should be no lower than primary), primary routes > tertiary, and demoted most if not all secondary and tertiary routes to > residential/unclassified. This seems like a way overboard change. I started > to fix the more obvious errors here, but it seems like it would be way > quicker and easier to revert the changeset and start over with fewer and more > conservative reclassifications. What are your thoughts on this? > > --Roadsguy > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
