On 2018.02.19. 15:28, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Having good paved/unpaved information will be a massive boost for OSM in
> comparison to other map providers. We're already partway there. As an
definitely. if somebody with the skills reads this, having that
reflected on the osm.org default render would be a huge help.
i'd map more surface status if it was more obvious.
> example, try asking Google Maps for bike directions from SF to NYC. It sends
> you down some really, really unsuitable tracks and I'm not entirely
> convinced you'd survive the journey. By contrast, cycle.travel (using OSM
> data) gets it pretty much right: occasionally it takes a gravel road
> unnecessarily but it's pretty much always rideable.
> It would be great if we could become the best map of the rural US just as we
> are for much of the rest of the world.
Talk-us mailing list