Jul 14, 2020, 02:20 by [email protected]: > On 7/13/2020 4:09 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote: >> >>> >>> The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be private; at least >>> in the US, one does not drive or walk directly up to someone's house >>> without having business there. (Someone making a delivery, obviously, >>> has business there.) >>> >> >> ...this seems to be the definition of access=destination? >> > > I'd say yes, that access=destination is closest to how I interpret most > driveways: you can walk/drive along the driveway if you have a good > reason, eg to make a delivery or an inquiry. > access=destination mean "no transit", not "with valid reason". access=destination on driveway means "cannot be used by transit", not "can be used if owner presumably agrees". access=destination has the same meaning as access=yes on ways that are not usable for transit (for example driveway attached to a single road on one end and leading into house) > If there was reason to believe you needed explicit permission to be on > that way, then access=private would be correct. > I am unsure what is the best way to tag "explicit permission not required, implicit permission is required" case. (it is not a big problem in Poland where nearly all such roads will have a gate anyway, bumping it into access=private)
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
