Jul 14, 2020, 13:17 by [email protected]: > On 7/14/2020 4:53 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote: > >> >> Jul 14, 2020, 02:20 by >> [email protected]>> : >> >>> If there was reason to believe you needed explicit permission to >>> be on >>> that way, then access=private would be correct. >>> >> I am unsure what is the best way to tag "explicit permission not >> required, >> implicit permission is required" case. (it is not a big problem in >> Poland >> where nearly all such roads will have a gate anyway, bumping it >> into access=private) >> > > I'm really not sure how to interpret "Implicit permission is required." > To my mind, if permission is implicit, it's not required > (access=permissive) and if permission is required, it's not implicit > (access=private.) > > You can go if you have a valid reason, even if not explicitly invited or permitted ("hello, I am a new neighbor"). You are now allowed if you have no valid reason ("I used this road to make shortcut" or "hello, I am a creepy stalker" or "hello, I am an onbnoxious peddler")
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
