We know its bell's problem because.
1. In spite of my order for analog land line service, noted in writing by
Bell accessibility, on March 15, a bell technician installed VoIP here,
getting permission from a sighted moving helper, and not speaking with me
as the account owner.
2. bell stated in writing that since other disabled customers can use
certain technology, I should use the same.
3. Bell first told Teksavy the analog service could be installed, then
sent again and again people intent on installing VOIP, because the first
tech insisted I could not be living alone, I am blind
I could Go on with more examples, like the different stories bell told
Teksavy to keep the money flowing until they pulled the plug, but I have
likely made my point
Karen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023, James Knott via talk wrote:
On 2023-09-07 15:13, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Reading the original post would remind one that Karen has already had
multiple interactions with Bell. Most have been negative, and she has
referred to some as "retaliatory". In other words, these paths have been
tried and failed.
How do you know it's Bell's problem.?? All we know is something
changed when she moved.
She has had multiple interactions, but were they with that department and not
just the normal help(?) line?
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
