I agree with much of what David has said below, but it seems to me that VFO 
could still be much more up front and direct about the changes being 
implemented and VFO's expectation that such changes will be beneficial to all 
of its customers.  Some corporate generated "spin" would be helpful.  

It is confusing to mere mortals who have paid for our Window-Eyes to read 
comments about dealers being withdrawn, but when I look here in New Zealand, I 
notice that VFO has two dealers, but neither of them historically at least 
deals with all products.  And in fact - I have an optelec braille display, 
purchased through a dealer who is not VFO.  So to whom has my Window-eyes 
record gone if I want support - which I don't and never get anyway? VFO as the 
front for Freedom Scientific has discouraged direct contact from customers 
outside of the U.S., whereas after much discussion I did have direct contact 
with the old GW Micro and the more recent AI Squared.   What happens if my 
Optelec product needs to be serviced?  So whilst mergers, takeovers, buy-outs 
etc inevitably bring changes as to how things are done, finding out through 
users being surprised at what they discover is simply bad public relations.
Regarding Window-eyes and my braille display: VFO still fronts Freedom 
Scientific far more vigourously than it does AI Squared and Optelec.  Given 
this - my uninformed, speculative logic indicates to me that perhaps Alva 
displays will be discontinued in preference to Focus displays, and that 
Window-Eyes will compete with NVDA as a free product, (but please donate if you 
like it) and so forth.  VFO's wall of death silence contributes to our 
uninformed speculation.  

Finally: why do we rant about this when VFO is not even having the decency of 
responding with at least some reassuring words prepared at great expense by the 
marketing and public relations team?

My answer: we just like talking to ourselves and venting, which is  the 
alternative to much more destructive courses of action.


Vaughan.




-----Original Message-----
From: Talk 
[mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of David via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:31 p.m.
To: Chris Skarstad; Window-Eyes Discussion List; [email protected]
Subject: Re: All phone calls now directed to VFO

Excuse me, please, but what is all the desperation about?


It is several months now, we have been aware VFO has bought AISquared, who in 
turn bought GWMicro a couple of years ago. So, would it not be simple as 
natural, to expect them to use their company name, when a customer calls in. If 
I changed my name to John, would you then be comfortable with me answering 
calls saying:

     "Hello, you are speaking to Peter!"?

Of course, if you are calling some department of VFO, it will be VFO and noone 
else who is rightfully answering the phone.


All you old-timers want them to still present themselves as GWMicro, 
when you call in. But if I was a new customer, or at least relatively 
new, calling a long-distance number for the first time - I sure would be 
confused if I know the manufacturer of my screen reader to be VFO, and 
someone comes on and say:

         "GWMicro, how may I help you?"


And since they are all one big company now, it is time for us to realize 
that their merging has been more fully completed. Gone are the days, 
when a front-desk operator had to be physically located in the same 
building as his employer. Who knows, when you call in now aday, the 
operator that answers the phone, might be sitting in his living room, 
back home in California, Texas, Virginia, or even in New England - 
simply just transfering your call to the actual department and personel.


Do you all know, that some companies even have dismissed their 
front-desk operator altogether these days? They buy the service from 
another company, who has specialized in that kind of services. So, 
calling a company, talking to some customer care personel, does no 
longer dictate that this person even is employed by the company he is 
representing when talking to you. He just sees which number you are 
calling, and knows what to answer accordingly.


Nope, I am by no means telling this to be the case here, but just 
because the company happens to use their real and updated name when 
answering the phone, does tell nothing as to whether they have stopped 
supporting their long-time customers.


Let's just finalize this message, with a scenario, and you all make up 
your mind. Imagine that GWMicro had never been sould out. They would 
have stayed exactly the same company, same staff, same productline. But 
for some reason, they decide to rename the company, giving themselves a 
more modern and humanlike name. So, they decide: We want to be named 
"Bread and butter".


Now, after the renaming process has all been completed with all 
authorities and registers, and you pick up your phone and call the 
company, what do you expect them to say when answering? Use their old, 
no longer valid name - thereby kind of being dishonest? - Or, use their 
new and legally registered name? - Would you all have flushed the list 
with messages saying things are nearing their underground, just because 
of the name change and the accordingly answered phone call?


People, stop desparing, start make sense. If you could come back on the 
list and tell us that the phone had been answered by a reliable 
representative, who could confirm that the screen reader no longer is in 
business - well then wake me up. Till then, I would have expected 
nothing else from a company, even view it as clear-cut naturalness, that 
the company presents themselves on the phone, with their legal name. 
That it happened right now, might be because it was right now all 
paper-work has been finished. Or, it might be they just decided it was a 
good and clean time to process the change, at the turn of a new year. I 
do see nothing in this, that indicates anything but the fact, the new 
company name is VFO, and will stay VFO. You don't stop being yourself, 
even if you change your surname when getting married, do you? Or, just 
because you happen to get a new cellphone, with another number. Where is 
the sense-making?



David

On 1/9/2017 9:38 PM, Chris Skarstad via Talk wrote:
> there has been absolutely no official announcement that window-eyes is 
> going away. I'm so glad everyone here has all the answers and that 
> we've all made up our minds despite no official announcement yet.  If 
> we did everything your guys way we'd all be in real trouble.
>
>
>
> On 1/9/2017 3:33 PM, Olusegun -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc. via Talk 
> wrote:
>> R I P Window-Eyes!  Even though we are still together, I must begin
>> preparing for the funeral service for real!  No, not trying to scare 
>> you,
>> but the handwriting is definitely on the wall and we can all refuse 
>> to read
>> it.  Sad doom days slowly coming down with a bang, bang!!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Olusegun
>> Denver, Colorado
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>
>> For membership options, visit 
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rascal0826%40verizon.net.
>> For subscription options, visit 
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> List archives can be found at 
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/trailerdavid%40hotmail.com.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> .
>

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd001%40msd.govt.nz.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

-------------------------------
This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and 
subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and attachments is 
prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the author 
immediately and erase all copies of the email and attachments. The Ministry of 
Social Development accepts no responsibility for changes made to this message 
or attachments after transmission from the Ministry.

-------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to