Frederik Ramm schrieb: > At the time, I thought we had somewhat of a consensus that we should > either create an extra list or have one condensed "voting issues" > posting per week (or so). > I don't think that 'or' is the right word here. If we want to split these topics into a seperate list, we really need someone to write down the "voting issues" posting per week.
Simply move the proposal stuff into a different list without this posting is probably a very bad move, since this tends to become the "elitist circle" that most people want to avoid (including myself). So is someone really willing to do the extra work to collect the "voting issues" posting weekly? I'm personally not, Robin maybe? > Alas, not much has changed since then, so I repeat the suggestion: > Let's create an extra list for formal aspects of tagging discussions. > If we find someone, who is doing the above job we might start with this summary posting in talk, in addition to the current postings and see how it works out. Then move over the "normal proposal discussion" to the new list a few weeks later if the summary tends to work ... Regards, ULFL P.S: I could even imagine a real automated system that will do all the proposal/RFC/voting stuff, collect it and send out such mails, but this is way beyond our current developer manpower I think. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
