Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<snip>

My understanding is (was?) that the lane tag indicated how many lanes
there were in each direction, so '1' would indicate a road which was 2
lanes, 1 in each direction.

The definitive answer is rather blank on the matter:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Key:lanes&action=edit


That needed fixing then - Done. Because when originally conceived it was
always intended to apply to the number of physical lanes on the way.

Cheers

Andy

As I'm new to this game, but very impressed by the bredth and depth of the documentation for OSM, I'm quite surprised that lanes isn't better described.

I assumed it was the number of lanes in each direction, and started tagging normal residential roads as lanes=1, then I found two spots where there's onyl room for traffic in one direction at a time (over a narrow bridge and through an ancient arch or folly). I was stumped how to tag these, but when I saw someone say lanes was the total number of lanes on that way (so in both directions for a non one way way) thought this was great.

Would it be too forward to suggest a Proposed features/lanes page. My proposal would be that lanes is the total number of lanes on the way, so ;

Two Way residential road with one lane in either direction: lanes=2
One way road: lanes=1
individual carriageway for three lane motorway: lanes=3

With a rationale that this would then clear up confusion, and help with recording information such as single lane width restrictions, passing places etc.

I then assume that some of the highway tags could then assume a lanes value (residential, unclassified, tertiary: lanes=2)

I'll happily edit the page, but don't want to step on decorum !

Thanks

Paul.

--
Paul Hurley     http://www.paulhurley.co.uk/
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
   Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to