On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andy Allan wrote: > > Gah. All the namespacing appears to be there to raise the barrier to > > entry, rather than solving any real problem. Once again, I will say > > that it is unnecessarily complicated. If I find a traction=something I > > will know that you are talking about railway traction because it is on > > a railway=something object. > > Clearly, there's no way that a traction key could ever be applied to > something that shares a way with a railway. That's not a real problem, > just something imaginary.
I see you've changed it from railway:incline:traction= to railway:traction= - but I still don't understand the need for the railway: prefix. Am I missing something obvious? What's wrong with just traction= ? Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
