Andy Allan wrote: > I see you've changed it from railway:incline:traction= to > railway:traction= - but I still don't understand the need for the > railway: prefix. Am I missing something obvious? What's wrong with > just traction= ?
I think it is possible, even likely, that we might want to apply it to something other than railway, which can share a way with a railway. The simple/plain traction= would preclude this. -Alex Mauer "hawke" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
