On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Nick wrote:
> It's very difficult to know what to do with climbing routes without
> truly 3-dimensional mapping - that said your suggestion sounds feasible.
Having thought more about this, my proposal has a problem: There is no way
to show the difference between a path leading to the bottom of a route and
the path leading to the top of the route. I'm starting to think that for
routes which do have a path to the top we need to have a node for both the
top and bottom with a way between them, even though a lot of the time
these nodes will be practically on top of each other...
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
