On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
> I'll guess we will agree to disagree then. If it works for you ane the other
> climbers amongst the contributors then of course you can do what works for
> you :-)
I don't think any other climbers have voiced an interest in tagging routes
yet, so I suspect it is just me for now. :)
> We would be back where we started 3 years go. "type" is no different from
> "class", the previous method of tagging which didn't scale easily.
Indeed.
What were the reasons for it not scaling well? I did have a poke around
Google but couldn't really find anything on the rationale behind dropping
the class system (notably, relations seem to go back to the idea of having
a "type" tag too...)
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
