Karl Newman wrote: > As someone else aptly put it earlier: OSM is about being machine-readable, > otherwise it might as well be OpenAerialMap.
Yes and no. It has to be machine-readable, true, but our USP is our active mapper userbase. So the design, accepting that it facilitates both, should be _optimised_ for ease of mapping, not for ease of parsing by machine. cheers Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
