On Saturday 28 June 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:10:54PM +0200, Ben Laenen wrote: > > * without making use of the namespaces like bicycle:oneway=* > > This is slightly tangential to your question but I take exception > to the way people use the term "namespace" over and over again > in osm discussions. It seems that everyone believes "if it has a > colon then it's a namespace". That is bollocks - "bicycle:oneway" > is just a structured tag, or a tag with a colon in it, but it > doesn't have a "namespace".
Don't understand me wrong there, I have nothing against namespaces (or however one wants to call things with colons in it). I was hoping that the people hating everything about namespaces would turn up and propose alternatives :-p I'd just like to find the easiest and cleanest possible way to get a partially two way road in OSM. If people like to see things like bicycle:oneway=* or good:maxweight=*, good, but I want to see formal definitions instead of what we have now. Greetings Ben _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
