I'm getting issues with the fact that access rules are never formally defined. For example, does this make a oneway road accessible for bicycles in two directions or not:
oneway=yes bicycle=yes For those saying that it doesn't, how would they propose a tag for allowing bicycles in two directions * without using the cycleway=opposite tag, it's ugly :-) * keeping in mind that bicycle=* in that case has less precedence over oneway=yes, so something like bicycle=twoway doesn't work (making that a special case so it has precedence over oneway would also be ugly) * without making use of the namespaces like bicycle:oneway=* Greetings Ben On Saturday 28 June 2008, Jo wrote: > Ben Laenen schreef: > > On my brainstorming page to improve the access restrictions scheme > > at > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Access_re > >strictions I was more thinking about a access=twoway or similar tag, > > so what you want to do becomes: oneway=yes; psv=twoway > > Or oneway:psv=no. What we have started doing for bicycles though is > to say oneway=yes, cycleway=opposite. This has always struck me as > kind of odd, but OK, so be it. We could also use oneway:bicycle=no. > > Anyway, the question is certainly valid. I can think of a few places > where buses can go in both directions and cars can go only in one. > Also I can think of many where this is the case for bicycles. > > Polyglot _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
