On Thursday 03 July 2008 16:31:00 Michael Collinson wrote: > > In Sweden, paths I've seen are either unsigned or when signed, > overwhelming with a blue sign for both cycle and foot. Cycle-only > paths are rare, and when I find them, I add foot=no. I wonder if > that is true for Germany and the Netherlands too?
In Germany (Berlin at least) you're likely to get angrily belled at if you stray into the cycle path as a pedestrian. Virtually all cycle paths are this way, and there are quite a lot of them (most major streets). That said, I am not aware of a case where there are cycle-only paths with no adjacent footpath or sidewalk. Possibly it is better to remove implication relationships amongst tags. Cycling is one thing, appropriateness of feet is another, no? Cheers, -w
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
