On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Michael Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I certainly agree that the default for foot access should be one or > the other for highway=cycleway. > > My own preference is for default foot=yes. I disagree - I think the default should be undefined. After all, it's been undefined for a while, and I don't like hidden assumptions that will be wrong for entire countries. I've been asked by a cycling group how they should be marking shared vs segregated, so how about highway=cycleway, cycleway = shared - both bikes and pedestrians sharing the same path, common in the UK. Has the blue sign with the bike over the pedestrians. highway=cycleway, cycleway = segregated - the path has a line down the middle, cyclists on one side, pedestrians on the other highway=cycleway, cycleway = cycleonly - bikes only, like the default in Germany ... but to be honest, I'm not entirely comfortable with it, and I still think the lane/lane_opposite doesn't handle things fully either. I found a bit in Hyde Park where there was a one-way road with cycle lanes on both sides - with all three lanes going in the same direction - and I don't know how to model that in OSM either. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
