On Monday 2008-09-01, Christopher Woods wrote: > > I guess you are not aware of the "reply all" button in > > thunderbird which does send to the mailing list, so it's only > > logical that "reply" does not send to the ML. > > > > Yes, "reply all" does send a copy directly to the author, but > > mailman is intelligent enough so you can tell it not to send > > dupes to people addressed directly (unless addressed by BCC, > > in which case there is no way to tell there was a dupe in the > > first place) > > So for all us Outlook users, if we hit Reply-All (like I just did to > reply to this), and my client inserts both Dirk's and Lance's addres into > the To: dialog but includes talk@openstreetmap.org in the CC field... > It's not a problem with the way the list is configured?
nope, a decent email client is supposed to have to following:
1) reply to sender -> reply to from adress (or contents of reply-to header
if present)
2) reply to all -> reply to every adress present
3) reply to list -> reply to value of list-post header
problem with outlook is that it lacks reply-to-list AFAIK (probably because
the built-in approximation of an email list in exchange groupware is a
shared folder with 'discussion' items, not an actual list)
--
Cheers, Cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
