Hi, Nic Roets wrote: > My guess is that your opposition is based on the fact that some (future) > routing system may not have enough information to calculate angles esp. when > non-junction nodes was removed during prepossessing.
I simply want a clear, non-interpreted rule that identifies the participating bits of road because I fear that many of these ideas are not safe against future modifications of the junction. I'm thinking of a T shaped junction where maybe someone adds a "sharp right" turning service way; unless we very very clearly say that the textual information in "no right turn" doesn't count, there may be people who interpret this as being stronger than anything expressed by relation members and think it applies to the service way. > Gosmore currently sees all restrictions as "maneuvers that are disallowed" > and none of them as "maneuvers that are compulsory". Another > misunderstanding. Initially this way my plan as well - a restriction, after all, is something that restricts your options. But then someone introduced the "restriction" tag, and others started to put in values like "only left turn"... which does match the signs here in Germany, strictly speaking we have no "no right turn" sign, we only have "only straight on or left" signs... Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
