Dave Stubbs <[email protected]> writes: > 2009/2/2 Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]>: >> Ulf Lamping wrote: >> >>> Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some >>> problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really >>> difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards something. >> >> smoothness:vehicle would make sense to me. But, you know, water under >> the bridge and all that. >> > > suitability_wheeled_vehicle would be even better.
Suitability sounds a bit more fitting than smoothness. And one could put the type of vehicle into the value like 'suitability=horse:good;mountainbike:bad;racebike:impossible' or something like that. Matthias _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
