Richard Fairhurst schrieb: > Ulf Lamping wrote: >> I guess you want to missunderstand this tag. > > The tag name should be descriptive. If there's widespread misunderstanding, > then the tag was misnamed. (And besides, the "wheeled" point still doesn't > address that what's good for an MTB is bad for a tourer.)
Again, the proposal page actually handles the point MTB vs. tourer. Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards something. One could use 1-10, but that's even harder to recognize. >> Do you know a *walker* with wheels? > > http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=wheelchair There's a *lot* of irony in your answer ... > >> Do you know a horse with wheels? > > http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=trojan+horse Ok, let's say were not tagging for trojan horses and our turkish mappers will probably be very happy ;-) On the other hand, this might better fit into the category "heavy load" which is probably a different story ... Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
