2009/2/2 Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]>: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some >> problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really >> difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards something. > > smoothness:vehicle would make sense to me. But, you know, water under > the bridge and all that. >
suitability_wheeled_vehicle would be even better. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
