On 4 Mar 2009, at 16:57, Matt Amos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:49 AM, MP <singular...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 3. Define a way for feedback from the community. Maybe some >>> unoffical >>> votes would have given an impression on how well a particular idea >>> would >>> have worked. >> >> Maybe put up a poll like: >> >> Do you think OSM should change license for all data from cc-by-sa >> to odbl? >> >> ( ) Yes, I agree >> ( ) Yes, but the license needs to be improved a bit first >> ( ) I am not sure >> ( ) I don't care, my contributions are PD. >> ( ) I need more information >> ( ) No, it is bad idea >> ... >> >> along with link to license text + explkanation why the change would >> be >> necessary, what about possible data deletion, etc .... > > richard has very helpfully started this process and posted a link to a > similar poll to the list. for reference > http://weait.com/content/when-should-derived-database-share-alike-be-required
There is nothing worse than legal opinion by lay consensus. Maybe an attack by aliens or CERN turning the world in to a black hole after a particle collider experiment goes wrong. Best Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
