> well, the confusion just begins to start ;-) A keep is not > corrispondent to a burg, it is corispondent to a donjon, maybe to a > "bergfried" in German. A keep is part of a castle, not the whole. If > you continue to say, that burg and chateau (=schloss) has roughly the > same meaning, you're still proofing that you should stick to > historic=castle and let others do the castle_type.
How do historians/archaeologists log castles/ruins, what criteria are they working from. ie its on a hill so its a hill fort, its got a moat so its a bling blah. From a quick google I can figgure a berg is a castle on a hill. Why make up a new system if one already exists. Jack _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
