> Ah yeah, those were the days when we didn't have a reliably working > map on the front page, so we were looking for alternatives (you can > just make out the map image is the old linework-on-landsat version. > But that's not an issue any more. >
Well, but it is an issue that the map we show off now, is not exactly feature rich (plain text: is nothing to show off). So I think the discussion is warranted to either add more bliing bling to the map, or give it a less dominant status. I personally prefer the second approach. The map on osm.org is mainly a working tool. It is not shiny, but it has a purpose and it does itss job well. So we should present it that way and give the "first row advantage" to those shiny feature-laden applications that serve well to impress and convince new people of OSM. Peter
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
