--- On Tue, 28/7/09, MarkS <o...@redcake.co.uk> wrote: > I'm not against getting rid of is_in, I just think we need > to manage the > change over a fair period of time to give the renderers a > chance to > catch up. It's irrelevant if place nodes don't already have is_in and instead of adding is_in tags we should be instead doing things better. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags David Earl
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags gary
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags andrzej zaborowski
- Re: [OSM-talk] is_in and similar tags John Smith