John Smith wrote: > > > --- On Tue, 28/7/09, andrzej zaborowski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Data being wrong is a moot point, it doesn't speak for >> either is_in >> tags or boundary polygons and neither help make data more >> correct >> really. > > data being stored consistently is the point.
I don't see why you think people entering boundary data will be more consistent than in entering anything else - we have huge inconsistencies all over the place. Our method of tagging encourages it. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
