Eagerness should be channelled, not suppressed. Richard
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Jason Cunningham <jamicu...@googlemail.com > wrote: > And I would be tempted to tag it > highway=footway > graffiti=yes > > I am beginning to think cycleway gets added by eager cyclists far more > often than should really happen. > > Jason Cunningham > user:jamicu > > 2009/9/10 Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:59 PM, James Livingston <doc...@mac.com> wrote: >> > >> > I don't really want to get into this argument again, but I believe >> > that either we're going to end up with local rules for the access >> > mappings, or some regions are going to have to tag every single >> > cycleway/footway with overrides. >> >> There is another option: The characteristics of *paths* should be >> tagged only as they exist *on the ground* - that is, surface, width, >> lanes, *signage*. Local laws should be known by the locals (and >> tourists should use the "I'm a tourist, Officer" + "but the sign >> didn't say I couldn't X here" excuse). I know this is probably >> controversial, but I think it is one way to define the scope to avoid >> some problems, and also enforces verifiability. >> >> > Personally, I think the former is >> > better because it's a lot less work and there are going to be other >> > things that need local interpretations - such as whether >> > highway=residential should be practically treated as >> > access=destination for the purposes of vehicle routing. >> >> Nah, I think access=destination roads should be marked as >> access=destination (when they are signed as such, as they are in, e.g. >> Brisbane, Australia). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
