Using the URL seems reasonable, since the URL is unique and the page title likely isn't unique.
-- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria -----Original Message----- From: "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:43:40 Cc: <talk@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Gervase Markham wrote: > >> e.g. maxspeed=no is the same as maxspeed=infinite Although technically correct (some autobahns?) it seems positively dangerous to label as such. (no). > oneway=no is useful for highway types which would usually imply oneway=yes: > highway=motorway, highway=motorway_link and junction=roundabout. The > southern A601(M), that bonkers sliproad on the M50, and (depending on > interpretation) the Swindon Magic Roundabout are UK examples of each case > where two-way traffic is permitted. > Richard Do you know where are the Motorway Ends signs are located in you examples? OS define the links as M* classification, but Google shows them as A* & B*. http://osm.org/go/evhVzyiB http://osm.org/go/euwqKRNL I interpret the the Magic Roundabout as separate lanes as there are central reservations. Which, I believe, is how you mapped it (?) http://osm.org/go/eumbs5che-- I notice in the relation for the MR, the wiki tag has the title of the relevant page. I've been using the URL. Is there a reason I shouldn't? Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
