Ulf Lamping wrote: > What part of "former cafe" is it that don't you understand?
Well, amenity=former_cafe I certainly DO understand. I thought that you were arguing in favour of the construct further up the thread: amenity=pub disused=yes To my mind a pub that doesn't serve beer some of the time isn't a pub. >> It's probably a decision best left to someone stood there in front of >> it rather than trying to impose a structure from above. > > That sentence makes no sense in the context of what I've written. What I was trying to say (and has also been explained perhaps more clearly by others) is that in some contexts "disused=yes" can make sense. It's impossible to imagine all the possibilities sat behind a keyboard. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
