On Wednesday 21 October 2009 15:45:49 Anthony wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Ulf Lamping <[email protected]> wrote: > > A former cafe can be helpful as a landmark as well. Especially when it's > > a free standing building (e.g. in a forest) near a larger city, which is > > not that uncommon in germany. > > So propose landmark=cafe. Much easier than changing the definitions > of both amenity and amenity=cafe.
Nobody is changing any definitions. They are just using a combination of two existing and widely used tags. Much, much easier than writing a proposal for a new tag. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
