On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Cartinus <[email protected]> wrote: > Map what you can verify: > * Often these are expanses of grass with the occasional bush -> > landuse=grass >
Not to be a pain, but that doesn't exist (or isn't documented). landuse=meadow I guess. That would actually satisfy a lot of my needs. > * They can be expanses of shrubland -> natural=shrub > natural=scrub? > Of course if you know it is greenfield/farmland there are landuse tags for > that. > Yeah. I guess the term "greenfield" is more common in the US? It seems a bit hard to verify that building is "scheduled". Does a big "sold" sign count? > If you really don't know what it is and can't describe it, then don't tag > it. > > Yeah, I think you're right. Still just coming to terms with the different tagging options (and the whole unregulated folksonomy concept...) I think I might write up some cross-cutting wiki pages like "vegetation", pointing people in the right directions for the subtle distinctions between natural= and landuse= etc. Steve
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
