Yours &c.
Steve On Dec 5, 2009, at 18:55, Ulf Lamping <[email protected]> wrote: > SteveC schrieb: >> On Dec 5, 2009, at 18:17, Ulf Lamping <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> SteveC schrieb: >>>> On Dec 5, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: >>>>> With a gun at their head: "Refuse: After the migration >>>>> (currently 26th February 2010), your contributions will not be >>>>> included in ODbL licensed downloads and you will not be able to >>>>> continue contributing.". >>>>> >>>>> If you call this a vote, then we have pretty different >>>>> understanding about voting. >>>> Ulf! >>>> Wonderful to have your input at this very late stage! Can we >>>> expect you to volunteer for the LWG? Please be sure to read the >>>> minutes of the last few months meetings first. Even better - can >>>> you outline your alternative suggestion? >>>> For some crazy reason the LWG thought it should start with the >>>> members of the OSMF, you know, the OSMF which set up the LWG in >>>> the first place and then move on to thousands of contributors >>>> once the members had decided what to do. Crazy I know! Maybe they >>>> should have started by asking random people in the street.. that >>>> would be fun! >>>> Anyway, do let us all know how your plan is better than what the >>>> LWG has built over the last year? Super looking forward to it! >>> >>> So this is a well designed and manufactured gun still heading at >>> the mappers head - to keep the picture. >>> >>> Maybe the OSMF / LWG should have *asked* the people involved the >>> most - the mappers? >> Are you also living on planet Frederik? Out of all the crazy claims >> this has to be the most crazy. Where have you been the past year of >> consultations? > > Yes, that's you're personal way of dealing with opinions that you > don't like. Not ones I don't like, ones full of BS because you don't want to work within a process and just sit about here at the last minute and moan. It's a serious point - where have you been the past year? Why the sudden intrest? > The next stage will be that you claim that you are evil. We all know > that. > > But how does that respond in any way to the suggestion I've made? do > we already have numbers about mappers that are in need of a better > license, can accept a PD license, will never want to change the > license, ... > > To the best of my knowledge ... no! > > Regards, ULFL > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
