On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Sebastian Hohmann <[email protected]> wrote: > I kind of miss the choise of "No, but I consider all my data PD". > Because even though any PD data could be also made ODbL, there is no > sense in declaring it PD if it's not collected and published as PD. > Unless there is a mechanisim in OSM to e.g. "Download only PD data" or a > seperate project that collects PD data (which is also put into > ODbL-OSM), I don't really see a sense in saying "My data is PD", since > it will not make any difference to "My data is ODbL". Or am I wrong? > > Greetings >
I added this entry in the poll because it will be one of the possible choices you will have in February: (from http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf) The current date for complete migration to the new license is 26th February 2010. Consent I hereby agree to the terms of the OpenStreetMap Contributor Terms, including re-licensing my contributions under the ODbL. [ Short scrolling box with complete Contributor Terms ] [Agree button] [Agree; and declare that I consider all my data PD (Public Domain) button] [Refuse button] Pieren _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
