On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, SteveC <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Anthony wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM, SteveC <[email protected]> wrote: > > The point is that *morally* you want the data to be PD and *morally* I > want it to be SA. > > > > Morally, I want my data to be SA. CC-BY-SA, to be specific. > > Well that doesn't work,
Why doesn't it work? > and ODbL is the next best thing. CC0 is the next best thing. > So we all agree, yay! > Except that we don't. Actually, if I could use any license for my own personal works, I'd probably use this, which I think is morally equivalent to CC-SA, but a lot simpler: "Copying, distribution, public performance, public display, digital audio transmission, and use of this work is permitted without restriction. Circumvention of any technological measure or measures which effectively control access to this work is permitted without restriction. Preparation of derivative works is permitted provided that you cause any such work to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License." Of course, it's based on US law. So while it's fine for my works, it's not the best for an international project. So it's great that we had Creative Commons to come up with an international equivalent.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
