Will to tomorrow, chk out swoop http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Graham Jones < [email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > I have not the faintest idea what that means, but it sounds impressive! > Please add it to the list, but it would be nice to define some of the terms > and abbreviations to help the ignorant like me! > > Thanks > > Graham. > > > On 11 March 2010 22:39, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Description : >> >> Integration of the java swoop ontology editor into JOSM. A JOSM ontology >> plugin. >> >> Work : >> >> 1. create a live mapping from OSM into RDF , so that the swoop can access >> the data in OSM without conversion. >> 2. be able to have the changes in the rdf be reflected back into the OSM. >> 4. conversion of the wiki into OWL, so that the rules and relations of the >> OSM are documented formally. >> 5. running of the pellet inference engine and all the other reasoning >> tools from swoop to infer new facts and validate the data. >> 6. encoding of the rules of the JOSM validator into OWL rules, maybe we >> will have to include new derived geometric things like if two ways intersect >> and also ways to only process data in a certain radius. >> >> mike >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Graham Jones < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I agree that improving documentation would be a really useful >>> contribution to OSM, but Google are quite explicit that this is outside of >>> the scope of GSoC ( >>> http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#doc_proposals >>> ). >>> >>> A project along the lines of 'context sensitive help in OSM editors' >>> could be a possibility though. I have never worked on one of the main >>> editors, so I have no idea how hard this would be from that point of view. >>> The Artifical Intelligence aspects are quite difficult in themselves though >>> - it would have to try to guess what you would like to do from what you have >>> just done - quite a challenge, but please add it to the list if you can >>> manage to describe it! >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> Graham. >>> >>> >>> On 11 March 2010 10:59, [email protected] < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> lets put it in a different perspective : >>>> >>>> Make the documentation as part of the program! >>>> >>>> I would like to see for example a help system that is integrated to the >>>> wiki, >>>> Click on a tag, have it pull up the wiki entry, be able to add new >>>> unknown tags or rename them. >>>> We could even have an OWL Ontology created with a reasoning engine to >>>> specify rules for tagging. >>>> >>>> Really, the software should be so good that you dont need docs or >>>> videos. >>>> >>>> mike >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Peteris Krisjanis >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> > GSoc >>>>> > student pool is a very talented one - it would be good to use them >>>>> for more >>>>> > critical things. Of course, OSM unlike other projects is basically a >>>>> > collection of tools maintained by various people, so difficult to >>>>> achieve a >>>>> > consensus. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> Having one place of knowhow of mapping is quite critical for project >>>>> like OSM. And believe me, creating good documentation requires quite a >>>>> skill and isn't easiest job in IT world as we would like to see. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Peter. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> talk mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Graham Jones >>> Hartlepool, UK >>> email: [email protected] >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Graham Jones > Hartlepool, UK > email: [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
